คำพูดราฟาที่ให้สัมภาษณ์ใน IB3 ค่ะ About the beginning of the season:
Im very happy with my results so far as they give me some kind of peace inside; however, its only the start of the year.
About the first clay-court tournament of the year:
I can only try to do the best I can in Monte Carlo and try to play at my highest level. Thats the only way I can have good results. The last 4 times there I won, there is something about that tournament that just fits with my game but you never know of course.
About Barcelona
Barcelona is one of the best clay court tournaments, its good history and its special to me. Im playing there for a special reason I dont get points or a title, so instead Im playing there because some of the best players in history have played there said Rafa.
วันนี้ราฟาออกมาคอนเฟิร์มค่ะว่าจะลงป้องกันแชมป์ที่ควีน ( ปีที่แล้วราฟาเป็นแชมป์ค่ะ ) "It is nice to come back to a place where you are the last champion," he said. "To arrive as the last champion is going to be a really nice experience."
"It was amazing," Nadal said. "It was totally unexpected for me to win after winning at Roland Garros. I arrived and all I had was one day to adapt to grass. But I played really, really good tennis. I played relaxed, without pressure and I played really well."
ราฟาพูดถึงวิมปีที่แล้วค่ะ "I remember I had a lot of nerves the night before the match," he said. "And then, during the match there were a lot of emotions.
"In the beginning, I had the match (under control) and I had match points. But he came back very good in the third and fourth sets and had the break point in the fifth set at 4-3.
"He had his chance there. I saw the match on TV for the first time last week. It was really amazing." ( I love itThat's Rafa !!! )
Last but not least, the interview with Gilles Simon closed the triptych on Rafael Nadal is a first-hand testimony by one of the most sophisticated players in the circuit. Krystel Roche is always conducting the interview in Marseille.
Are the values in which Nadal has been raised are important? Yes. I think it is very important, because a player who is very, very respectful of all its opponents. And even if, when he arrived on the circuit, he had the same attitudes that I did not especially (when it really encourage each point), he really has changed, it is much more temperate. Frankly, at the attitude is by far the No. 1.
Trains there more than others? Have the same behavior in training and match? No. Absolutely not. Having trained with him several times, I can say that in training, he tried a lot of things he can not do, it is quite regular. It is not that he takes more risks than usual ... he only takes a risk! (smile) he hits very hard, looking for the winning two strikes, to change his game for me, the first time I trained with him, I said "never again I play with him! "(And I'm not the only one) To tell you ... And yet I love it. Because he was there to work on his thing, and attempting to reach the winning point after two strikes ... I saw a game the next day: he made no mistake, played at the baseline, defending, while the stand-in 'training, service-it was stolen, return stolen etc ... So that's why I say no, it is not at all like the training and match! (smile)
You could, like him, t'entraine with a member of your family? Today: No, because I have no one in my family that can help me on the cout. After all, everyone has his own story. From what I see from the outside, it seems obvious to me that Toni was a very important role.
What is the importance of his rivalry with Federer in his progression? I think Nadal has greatly increased because there was Federer in the face. Federer made him aware of his limitations on certain surfaces in the beginning, Rafa and he continued to work. It's a winner baby, necessarily: as long as he remains a player stronger than him, he will always be everything to catch up. Personally, I think his success factor No. 1 - and it still plays a little today-is that it was someone who was always underestimated compared to the level he had. I found it terrible the way he has been underestimated all the time, the way in which it was underestimated all the time, to be initially categorized as a beaten ground bourrin who can only run... And I think, his strength is he was not irritated after that. He has played. Even today, being No. 1 worldwide, claim that it leaves Federer is in front, while it seems absurd to think that Federer is stronger than him after the beating I do not know how many times, and now on all surfaces! And for all that, the fact that it is undervalued compared to Federer just because people continue to find it normal ... yes, Federer is still No. 1, and that he did not bookmark it ... Rafa is so underrated ... (sigh) It seems absurd to think that a player who has six Grand Slams on three different surfaces at 22 years, knows how to do THAT bourrin a bump and run. That is to say that ... If it was so much below Federer and his artistic genius, as we hear about - I love Federer, and really it is a artistic genius! - But what I am saying is that I do not think Federer is stronger than Nadal. I watch the matches, and I see that Nadal won 10 times, 15 times against Federer. I just can not believe that Federer is stronger than Nadal. He was, it no longer. And Nadal has used it to continue to grow. When we did not expect her on grass, he made his first final Wim ', "And yeah, it's luck, he had a good table foobar etc ...". Second season, one more final Wim ': "Yeah, but good against Federer it does not ...." Except that now, at that time, he lost in five sets. And, finally, he won in 2008. Him that it was cataloged as the player who could win on clay. Federer, from the start, has struggled on grass. What I find amazing is that some may still believe that Rafa, this is a gross cogne and running ... So it is much more than that. For me, both are completely equal. Federer has a better track record, but they do not have the same age either! Nadal's strength: to stay more than two or three years ... No. 2! With more than 5,000 ranking points! While some have been No. 1 with less points than that in the history of tennis! And stay there, never letting go, never giving up ... Not to mention the frustration you must have to be No. 2 just because you have an alien as Federer plays at the same time as you ... We see that, other players, it discourages them. Djoko, who came very close: it seems that he has declined a bit. At first, he said, "I will eat the two." And finally, deal with the density as it asked to be in the final, winning all the time, it was felt, especially in his attitude (although, at the level of classification, there is 3 and very close) that it fell a bit ... Nadal, the mental strength! To remain No. 2 in the world for three years, beating Federer tons of time, to hear that Federer is 100 times better than it will never be .... I think it had to be tough, and he ultimately used it to his hole, quiet start to grow on all surfaces. And finally, be No. 1. And undisputed No. 1 today. He can say what he wants, that Federer is stronger, etc. Today, it is undisputed No. 1, with an incredible advance. I say all this without really denigrate Roger, because that, once again, is a player that I respect enormously, and I thank because I do not know how many people and tennis players live through him. But it is just to emphasize that I find absurd that some comments I heard on Nadal, whereas for me it is under great champions like Federer and point.
Coming back to Nadal, is it so important that he is a lefty? A lot. Because his weapon is his right cross shot that splashes enormously. Already, against all the players who have a single-handed backhand, he has a huge advantage in this series then won a number of points incalculable that. And, obviously, being left-handed help much. Particularly for his service is not incredible, but it is very annoying because it takes an incredible angle. It would have the same service right, it would greatly reduce the bad, we always return. But that is left is difficult. A small slice later benefit when you return and that shifts in law blow it has all the ground, and good ... This is not the same in the other direction.
What say you out of court just after having suffered? I think that it is a pleasure of playing against him each time. Because on the level of the attitude it is irreproachable. Because it respects no matter what it arrives its adversary. Because despite everything the tournaments which it gains, and the fact that it is n°1, it is not caught for another. Therefore, really, it is always a pleasure of playing against him.
Rafa, when there some has more, there some has again? Physically, sometimes, it is seen that it is tired. That was the case for example in Australian Open. But what is incredible, it is its attention. Its capacity to fix its attention, even when it is hard. It is seen: it moves a little less better, runs a little less quickly, but on the level of the attitude: it does not move. There remains concentrated on each point. Even if that lasts five hours, during five hours, it is concentrated on all the points. And that, it is a thing almost impossible to make. It is the only one which I see doing that.
What could he envy in your game? Not much, in my opinion! (laughs). If there is only one trick which he must be able envy me, maybe my backhand. anyway, he improved his so much, that today I am not sure that it is worse than mine. Afterwards, he does not have anything to envy me the level of the endurance, of the blow right either, the service either, either stolen, mental either. It is for that it is n°1 besides (to smile)
" And I think that there is a real chance that by the end of the year Murray will be world number one.
If he beats Nadal more than Nadal beats him this year, by which I mean winning the US Open, and possibly also Wimbledon, then he will be number one. And it would be justified, because I genuinely think he is the best player in the world at the moment - except on clay.
You'd have to expect Nadal to win at Roland Garros, but for every other tournament who is going to be the favourite? It's got to be Murray."
)
That's Rafa !!! )
( ราฟาปีปัญหากับนิ้ว ฮ่า ๆ
)
เนี่ยป่านนี้ไปอยู่แถวไหนแล้วก็ยังไม่รู้เลย คาดว่าที่ MC นี่ก็จะได้แข่งเงียบๆที่คอร์ทบ้านนอก ไม่มีใครถ่ายทอดสด รูปก็คงจะไม่มีใครถ่าย เพราะเค้าไปตามถ่ายนุ้งแอนกันอยู่ (ขนาดที่ไมอามี่กะ IW รวมกันแล้วชิลยังมีแค่สองสามรูปเอ๊งงง) คือถ้าอยากเห็นหน้าชิล สงสัยต้องรอลุ้นให้เข้ารอบ QF อ่ะนะ 
ตกลงมันยังเป็นมือวางอยู่มั้ยเนี่ย 
น้องพี่น่ารักจริงๆ 
ฝากข้อความหลังไมค์
Rss Feed
ผู้ติดตามบล็อก : 1 คน [
ตอบพี่แฟนใหม่จากบล๊อกที่แล้วค่ะ มีทีมไหนอยากได้เทพลูคัสไหมคะ จะแถมเงินให้เลย
เอาสัมภาษณ์ชิลพูดถึงราฟามาฝากพี่รวัลย์กับพี่มะนาวค่ะ ( ส้มเคยเอามาลงแล้วแต่นี่เป็นฉบับเต็ม ๆ ค่ะ ) ต้นฉบับเป็นภาษา FR แปลโดยกูเกิ้ลค่ะ
Last but not least, the interview with Gilles Simon closed the triptych on Rafael Nadal is a first-hand testimony by one of the most sophisticated players in the circuit. Krystel Roche is always conducting the interview in Marseille.
Are the values in which Nadal has been raised are important?
Yes. I think it is very important, because a player who is very, very respectful of all its opponents. And even if, when he arrived on the circuit, he had the same attitudes that I did not especially (when it really encourage each point), he really has changed, it is much more temperate. Frankly, at the attitude is by far the No. 1.
Trains there more than others? Have the same behavior in training and match?
No. Absolutely not. Having trained with him several times, I can say that in training, he tried a lot of things he can not do, it is quite regular. It is not that he takes more risks than usual ... he only takes a risk! (smile) he hits very hard, looking for the winning two strikes, to change his game for me, the first time I trained with him, I said "never again I play with him! "(And I'm not the only one) To tell you ... And yet I love it. Because he was there to work on his thing, and attempting to reach the winning point after two strikes ... I saw a game the next day: he made no mistake, played at the baseline, defending, while the stand-in 'training, service-it was stolen, return stolen etc ... So that's why I say no, it is not at all like the training and match! (smile)
You could, like him, t'entraine with a member of your family?
Today: No, because I have no one in my family that can help me on the cout. After all, everyone has his own story. From what I see from the outside, it seems obvious to me that Toni was a very important role.
What is the importance of his rivalry with Federer in his progression?
I think Nadal has greatly increased because there was Federer in the face. Federer made him aware of his limitations on certain surfaces in the beginning, Rafa and he continued to work. It's a winner baby, necessarily: as long as he remains a player stronger than him, he will always be everything to catch up. Personally, I think his success factor No. 1 - and it still plays a little today-is that it was someone who was always underestimated compared to the level he had. I found it terrible the way he has been underestimated all the time, the way in which it was underestimated all the time, to be initially categorized as a beaten ground bourrin who can only run... And I think, his strength is he was not irritated after that. He has played. Even today, being No. 1 worldwide, claim that it leaves Federer is in front, while it seems absurd to think that Federer is stronger than him after the beating I do not know how many times, and now on all surfaces! And for all that, the fact that it is undervalued compared to Federer just because people continue to find it normal ... yes, Federer is still No. 1, and that he did not bookmark it ... Rafa is so underrated ... (sigh) It seems absurd to think that a player who has six Grand Slams on three different surfaces at 22 years, knows how to do THAT bourrin a bump and run. That is to say that ... If it was so much below Federer and his artistic genius, as we hear about - I love Federer, and really it is a artistic genius! - But what I am saying is that I do not think Federer is stronger than Nadal. I watch the matches, and I see that Nadal won 10 times, 15 times against Federer. I just can not believe that Federer is stronger than Nadal. He was, it no longer. And Nadal has used it to continue to grow. When we did not expect her on grass, he made his first final Wim ', "And yeah, it's luck, he had a good table foobar etc ...". Second season, one more final Wim ': "Yeah, but good against Federer it does not ...." Except that now, at that time, he lost in five sets. And, finally, he won in 2008. Him that it was cataloged as the player who could win on clay. Federer, from the start, has struggled on grass. What I find amazing is that some may still believe that Rafa, this is a gross cogne and running ... So it is much more than that. For me, both are completely equal. Federer has a better track record, but they do not have the same age either! Nadal's strength: to stay more than two or three years ... No. 2! With more than 5,000 ranking points! While some have been No. 1 with less points than that in the history of tennis! And stay there, never letting go, never giving up ... Not to mention the frustration you must have to be No. 2 just because you have an alien as Federer plays at the same time as you ... We see that, other players, it discourages them. Djoko, who came very close: it seems that he has declined a bit. At first, he said, "I will eat the two." And finally, deal with the density as it asked to be in the final, winning all the time, it was felt, especially in his attitude (although, at the level of classification, there is 3 and very close) that it fell a bit ... Nadal, the mental strength! To remain No. 2 in the world for three years, beating Federer tons of time, to hear that Federer is 100 times better than it will never be .... I think it had to be tough, and he ultimately used it to his hole, quiet start to grow on all surfaces. And finally, be No. 1. And undisputed No. 1 today. He can say what he wants, that Federer is stronger, etc. Today, it is undisputed No. 1, with an incredible advance. I say all this without really denigrate Roger, because that, once again, is a player that I respect enormously, and I thank because I do not know how many people and tennis players live through him. But it is just to emphasize that I find absurd that some comments I heard on Nadal, whereas for me it is under great champions like Federer and point.
Coming back to Nadal, is it so important that he is a lefty?
A lot. Because his weapon is his right cross shot that splashes enormously. Already, against all the players who have a single-handed backhand, he has a huge advantage in this series then won a number of points incalculable that. And, obviously, being left-handed help much. Particularly for his service is not incredible, but it is very annoying because it takes an incredible angle. It would have the same service right, it would greatly reduce the bad, we always return. But that is left is difficult. A small slice later benefit when you return and that shifts in law blow it has all the ground, and good ... This is not the same in the other direction.
What say you out of court just after having suffered?
I think that it is a pleasure of playing against him each time. Because on the level of the attitude it is irreproachable. Because it respects no matter what it arrives its adversary. Because despite everything the tournaments which it gains, and the fact that it is n°1, it is not caught for another. Therefore, really, it is always a pleasure of playing against him.
Rafa, when there some has more, there some has again?
Physically, sometimes, it is seen that it is tired. That was the case for example in Australian Open. But what is incredible, it is its attention. Its capacity to fix its attention, even when it is hard. It is seen: it moves a little less better, runs a little less quickly, but on the level of the attitude: it does not move. There remains concentrated on each point. Even if that lasts five hours, during five hours, it is concentrated on all the points. And that, it is a thing almost impossible to make. It is the only one which I see doing that.
What could he envy in your game?
Not much, in my opinion! (laughs). If there is only one trick which he must be able envy me, maybe my backhand. anyway, he improved his so much, that today I am not sure that it is worse than mine. Afterwards, he does not have anything to envy me the level of the endurance, of the blow right either, the service either, either stolen, mental either. It is for that it is n°1 besides (to smile)